Rethinking Hydrogen Cars
The July 18th issue of Science Magazine has an interesting
article that gives a critical eye to the idea that hydrogen-powered
automobiles is the best way to attack our environmental problems. (The
article is also currently cached here for
those without a subscription to Science.) The article makes two main points:
- The hydrogen-fuel infrastructure will be expensive (around $5000
per car).
- The bang-for-the-buck environmental improvement from replacing gas cars
with fuel-cell cars won't be as good as simply improving the fuel
efficiency of existing cars on the road (especially ancient "high
emitters"). They also identify fuel-burning power plants as a more
cost-effective target for cutting emissions than the already-optimized
gas-powered automobile. "When emission mitigation opportunities across the
economy are ordered by their cost (to form a supply curve), dep reductions
in automobile emissions are not inthe cheapest 30%... Hydrogen cars should
be seen as one of several long-run options, but they make no sense any time
soon" concludes the report. The report also notes that even in the area of
transportation, hydrogen-powered heavy freight vehicles such as ships,
trains and large trucks would be better first targets for conversion than
the automobile.
Fuel
Cell Today suggests that some of their numbers may be exagerated,
especially when it comes to the cost of they hydrogen-fuel infrastructure
needed for fuelcell-powered cars. In particular, they point out that the
huge financial commitment auto makers have made to fuelcell technology is a
good indication that they believe it will be economically viable. They also
note that many of the alternatives raised in the Science article, while
perhaps better targets from an energy-efficiency standpoint, are not
possible in the current political climate.
Even given this criticism, the general point seems to be well-taken. As
Marianne Mintz, author of one of the reports cited in the Science article,
says to Fuel Cell Today, "They're basically trying to make the point that
there are other options that deserve a fair share of attention in the near
term. I don't think that anybody would argue with that."
References:
- Rethinking
Hydrogen Cars (Science Magazine, 18 July 2003)
- Rethinking
Hydrogen Cars (Science Magazine, 18 July 2003, Cached copy that does
not need subscription)
- Fuel
cell cost study gets mixed reaction (Fuel Cell Technology, 28 July
2003)
Posted by bug to Politics at August 4, 2003 10:18 PM
| TrackBack